coop: be cheaper than condo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, grocery store
Weight: 0.52
, place
Weight: 0.51
, structure
Weight: 0.47
, artist
Weight: 0.47
Siblings nest
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31
, dog poop
Weight: 0.31
, crate
Weight: 0.31
, backyard
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than condo 1.00
be cheaper than condos 0.94
be less expensive than condos 0.93
be vs condo 0.89
is cheaper 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(grocery store, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(coop, be cheaper than condo)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(grocery store, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, is cheaper)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(grocery store, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(coop, be cheaper than condo)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coop, be vs condo)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(coop, be less expensive than condos)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(coop, be vs condo)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(coop, be vs condo)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condos)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(coop, be vs condo)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condos)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(coop, be cheaper than condos)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(coop, be less expensive than condos)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(coop, be less expensive than condos)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(coop, be less expensive than condos)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coop, be cheaper than condos)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(coop, is cheaper)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(coop, is cheaper)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(coop, is cheaper)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(coop, is cheaper)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(coop, be cheaper than condo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(grocery store, is cheaper)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(coop, be cheaper than condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(grocery store, is cheaper)