coop: be cheaper than condos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, grocery store
Weight: 0.52
, place
Weight: 0.51
, structure
Weight: 0.47
, artist
Weight: 0.47
Siblings nest
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31
, dog poop
Weight: 0.31
, crate
Weight: 0.31
, backyard
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than condos 1.00
be less expensive than condos 0.97
be cheaper than condo 0.94
be vs condo 0.81
is cheaper 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(grocery store, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coop, be cheaper than condos)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(grocery store, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, is cheaper)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(grocery store, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condos)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(coop, be cheaper than condos)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(coop, be less expensive than condos)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coop, be vs condo)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condo)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condo)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(coop, be less expensive than condos)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(coop, be vs condo)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(coop, be less expensive than condos)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(coop, be cheaper than condo)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(coop, be less expensive than condos)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(coop, be vs condo)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(coop, be vs condo)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(coop, be cheaper than condo)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(coop, is cheaper)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(coop, is cheaper)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(coop, is cheaper)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(coop, is cheaper)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coop, be cheaper than condos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(grocery store, is cheaper)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(coop, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(grocery store, is cheaper)