coop: be vs condo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, grocery store
Weight: 0.52
, place
Weight: 0.51
, structure
Weight: 0.47
, artist
Weight: 0.47
Siblings nest
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31
, dog poop
Weight: 0.31
, crate
Weight: 0.31
, backyard
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs condo 1.00
be cheaper than condo 0.89
be cheaper than condos 0.81
be less expensive than condos 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coop, be vs condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(coop, be vs condo)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(coop, be vs condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condo)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(coop, be vs condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(coop, be cheaper than condos)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(coop, be vs condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(coop, be cheaper than condo)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(coop, be vs condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(coop, be less expensive than condos)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(coop, be vs condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(coop, be less expensive than condos)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(coop, be vs condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(coop, be cheaper than condos)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coop, be vs condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(coop, be less expensive than condos)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(coop, be vs condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(coop, be cheaper than condo)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(coop, be vs condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(coop, be less expensive than condos)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(coop, be vs condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coop, be cheaper than condos)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coop, be vs condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condo)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coop, be vs condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(coop, be cheaper than condos)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(coop, be vs condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(coop, be vs condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(coop, be vs condo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coop, be vs condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(coop, be vs condo)