cooperation: be in workplace

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.63
, value
Weight: 0.62
, behavior
Weight: 0.61
, trait
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings openness
Weight: 0.33
, transparency
Weight: 0.33
, integration
Weight: 0.32
, solidarity
Weight: 0.32
, normalization
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in workplace 1.00
be in workplace important 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(behavior, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cooperation, be in workplace)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cooperation, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(behavior, be in workplace)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cooperation, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(behavior, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(cooperation, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cooperation, be in workplace)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cooperation, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cooperation, be in workplace)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cooperation, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cooperation, be in workplace important)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(cooperation, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(cooperation, be in workplace important)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(cooperation, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cooperation, be in workplace important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(cooperation, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cooperation, be in workplace important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(cooperation, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cooperation, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cooperation, be in workplace)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cooperation, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cooperation, be in workplace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cooperation, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(behavior, be in workplace)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(cooperation, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(behavior, be in workplace)