behavior: be in workplace

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.63
, act
Weight: 0.61
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
, indicator
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sexual activity
Weight: 0.71
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68
, altruism
Weight: 0.68
, cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in workplace 1.00
be important in workplace 0.97
be problem in workplace 0.92
be in workplace difficult 0.91
be committed in workplace 0.85
be ethical issue in workplace 0.85
be unethical behaviour in workplace 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be committed in workplace)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be important in workplace)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be ethical issue in workplace)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be problem in workplace)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be important in workplace)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be committed in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be committed in workplace)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be problem in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be problem in workplace)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be ethical issue in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be ethical issue in workplace)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(behavior, be in workplace)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be important in workplace)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(behavior, be important in workplace)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(behavior, be important in workplace)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(behavior, be important in workplace)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(behavior, be in workplace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be important in workplace)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be committed in workplace)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be problem in workplace)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be ethical issue in workplace)