sexual harassment: be in workplace difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual assault
Weight: 0.77
, complaint
Weight: 0.70
, crime
Weight: 0.69
, behavior
Weight: 0.69
Siblings flirting
Weight: 0.54
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.39
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.38
, rape
Weight: 0.37
, bullying
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in workplace difficult 1.00
be important in workplace 0.94
be in workplace 0.91
be problem in workplace 0.89
be unethical behaviour in workplace 0.83
be ethical issue in workplace 0.82
be committed in workplace 0.81
is difficult 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(behavior, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(behavior, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(behavior, be in workplace)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(behavior, be important in workplace)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(behavior, is difficult)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be important in workplace)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(behavior, is difficult)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(behavior, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(behavior, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be committed in workplace)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be committed in workplace)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be committed in workplace)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be in workplace)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be ethical issue in workplace)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be ethical issue in workplace)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be ethical issue in workplace)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be important in workplace)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be important in workplace)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be important in workplace)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be committed in workplace)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be important in workplace)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be ethical issue in workplace)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be problem in workplace)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be problem in workplace)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be problem in workplace)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be problem in workplace)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(behavior, be in workplace)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(behavior, be important in workplace)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(behavior, is difficult)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(behavior, be in workplace)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(behavior, be important in workplace)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(behavior, is difficult)