copper: be better condutor than iron

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.71
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, commodity
Weight: 0.66
, metal
Weight: 0.65
, resource
Weight: 0.64
Siblings copper sulfate
Weight: 0.79
, zinc
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.38
, gold
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better condutor than iron 1.00
be more expensive than iron 0.93
be more useful than iron 0.93
be less reactive than iron 0.89
be more useful than iron for building 0.89
be more resistant than metals like iron 0.84
be better than aluminum 0.81
be better than gold 0.80
be better than graphite 0.78
be more expensive than aluminum 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(gold, be more expensive than iron)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(gold, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(gold, be more expensive than iron)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(copper, be better condutor than iron)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(copper, be more expensive than iron)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(copper, be less reactive than iron)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(copper, be more expensive than iron)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(copper, be more expensive than iron)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(copper, be more expensive than iron)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(copper, be better than gold)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(copper, be less reactive than iron)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(copper, be less reactive than iron)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(copper, be less reactive than iron)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(copper, be better than gold)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(copper, be better than gold)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(copper, be better than gold)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(copper, be better condutor than iron)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(copper, be better condutor than iron)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(gold, be more expensive than iron)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(copper, be better condutor than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)