copper: be less reactive than iron

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.71
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, commodity
Weight: 0.66
, metal
Weight: 0.65
, resource
Weight: 0.64
Siblings copper sulfate
Weight: 0.79
, zinc
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.38
, gold
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be less reactive than iron 1.00
be more expensive than iron 0.91
be less reactive than magnesium 0.90
be less reactive than zinc 0.89
be better condutor than iron 0.89
be more reactive than silver 0.89
be more useful than iron 0.89
be more reactive than zinc 0.88
be less reactive than potassium 0.87
be less reactive than hydrogen 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(copper, be less reactive than iron)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(gold, be more expensive than iron)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(copper, be less reactive than iron)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(copper, be less reactive than iron)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be less reactive than zinc)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(copper, be less reactive than iron)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(gold, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(gold, be more expensive than iron)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(copper, be less reactive than iron)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(aluminum, be less reactive than zinc)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be less reactive than zinc)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(copper, be less reactive than iron)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(copper, be less reactive than iron)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(copper, be less reactive than iron)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(copper, be less reactive than iron)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(copper, be less reactive than magnesium)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(copper, be less reactive than iron)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(copper, be less reactive than magnesium)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(copper, be less reactive than iron)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(copper, be less reactive than magnesium)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(copper, be less reactive than iron)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(copper, be less reactive than magnesium)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(copper, be less reactive than iron)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(copper, be more reactive than silver)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(copper, be less reactive than iron)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(copper, be less reactive than iron)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(copper, be less reactive than iron)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(copper, be less reactive than iron)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(copper, be less reactive than iron)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(copper, be less reactive than iron)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(gold, be more expensive than iron)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(copper, be less reactive than iron)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(aluminum, be less reactive than zinc)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(copper, be less reactive than iron)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than iron)