copper: be more reactive than silver

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.71
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, commodity
Weight: 0.66
, metal
Weight: 0.65
, resource
Weight: 0.64
Siblings copper sulfate
Weight: 0.79
, zinc
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.38
, gold
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more reactive than silver 1.00
be less reactive than zinc 0.90
be more reactive than zinc 0.90
be less reactive than iron 0.89
be less reactive than magnesium 0.88
be better than gold 0.85
be less reactive than hydrogen 0.84
be more conductive than gold 0.83
be less reactive than potassium 0.82
be more expensive than zinc 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(copper, be more reactive than silver)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be less reactive than zinc)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(copper, be more reactive than silver)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(aluminum, be less reactive than zinc)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be less reactive than zinc)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(copper, be more reactive than silver)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(copper, be more reactive than silver)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(copper, be more reactive than silver)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(copper, be less reactive than magnesium)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(copper, be more reactive than silver)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(copper, be less reactive than magnesium)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(copper, be more reactive than silver)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(copper, be less reactive than magnesium)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(copper, be more reactive than silver)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(copper, be less reactive than magnesium)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(copper, be more reactive than silver)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(copper, be better than gold)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(copper, be more reactive than silver)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(copper, be more reactive than silver)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(copper, be more reactive than silver)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(copper, be more reactive than silver)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(copper, be more reactive than silver)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(copper, be more reactive than silver)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(aluminum, be less reactive than zinc)