cost: be calculated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be calculated 1.00
be calculated in states 0.90
be used calculating 0.86
be calculated in india 0.83
be calculated in united states 0.82
be for cs calculated 0.82
be per click calculated 0.80
be measured 0.79
be calculated on stock transactions 0.78
be for police operations calculated 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(estimate, be used calculating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cost, be calculated)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(variable, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cost, be calculated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(estimate, be used calculating)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(variable, be measured)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(estimate, be used calculating)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(variable, be measured)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in united states)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in india)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tuition, be for cs calculated)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(fee, be calculated on stock transactions)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(fee, be calculated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(estimate, be used calculating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cost, be calculated)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(variable, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cost, be calculated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(fee, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(fee, be calculated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(tuition, be for cs calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(tuition, be for cs calculated)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(income tax, be calculated in united states)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be calculated in india)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(fee, be calculated on stock transactions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(fee, be calculated on stock transactions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(cost, be calculated)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cost, be measured)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be for police operations calculated)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cost, be per click calculated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cost, be per click calculated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cost, be measured)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(cost, be measured)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cost, be per click calculated)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cost, be measured)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(cost, be per click calculated)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cost, be for police operations calculated)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cost, be for police operations calculated)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cost, be for police operations calculated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, be calculated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cost, be calculated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(estimate, be used calculating)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(variable, be measured)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fee, be calculated)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in states)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in united states)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fee, be calculated on stock transactions)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(tuition, be for cs calculated)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(estimate, be used calculating)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(cost, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(variable, be measured)