cost: be estimated for individual jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be estimated for individual jobs 1.00
be estimated for jobs 0.96
has state jobs 0.80
jobs 0.79
is estimate 0.77
be considered indirect cost 0.77
be applied to jobs 0.76
have total flight cost half 0.75
have total flight cost half of 0.75
be divided into two classifications in process costing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(overhead, be considered indirect cost)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(overhead, be applied to jobs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fee, have total flight cost half)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fee, have total flight cost half of)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tuition, has state jobs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(tuition, jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(tuition, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tuition, jobs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tuition, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tuition, has state jobs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(fee, have total flight cost half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(fee, have total flight cost half)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fee, have total flight cost half of) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(fee, have total flight cost half of)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(overhead, be considered indirect cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(overhead, be considered indirect cost)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(overhead, be applied to jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(overhead, be applied to jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(cost, be estimated for individual jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cost, be estimated for jobs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cost, be estimated for jobs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(cost, be estimated for jobs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cost, is estimate)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(cost, be divided into two classifications in process costing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cost, is estimate)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cost, be divided into two classifications in process costing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(cost, be divided into two classifications in process costing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(cost, is estimate)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for jobs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cost, be divided into two classifications in process costing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, is estimate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for individual jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cost, be estimated for individual jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(tuition, jobs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(tuition, has state jobs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fee, have total flight cost half)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fee, have total flight cost half of)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(overhead, be considered indirect cost)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for individual jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(overhead, be applied to jobs)