cost: be estimated for jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be estimated for jobs 1.00
be estimated for individual jobs 0.96
jobs 0.83
has state jobs 0.82
is estimate 0.80
be applied to jobs 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(overhead, be applied to jobs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tuition, has state jobs)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(tuition, jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(tuition, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tuition, jobs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tuition, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tuition, has state jobs)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(overhead, be applied to jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(overhead, be applied to jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(cost, be estimated for jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for individual jobs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cost, is estimate)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cost, is estimate)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cost, is estimate)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(cost, is estimate)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(cost, be estimated for individual jobs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(cost, be estimated for individual jobs)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cost, be estimated for individual jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cost, be estimated for jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(tuition, jobs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(tuition, has state jobs)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(overhead, be applied to jobs)