overhead: be applied to jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, equipment
Weight: 0.62
, shot
Weight: 0.60
, operating expense
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ventilation system
Weight: 0.32
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.32
, power line
Weight: 0.32
, landing gear
Weight: 0.32
, utilization
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be applied to jobs 1.00
be estimated for jobs 0.78
be estimated for individual jobs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cost, be estimated for individual jobs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(overhead, be applied to jobs)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cost, be estimated for jobs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(overhead, be applied to jobs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overhead, be applied to jobs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cost, be estimated for jobs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overhead, be applied to jobs)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(cost, be estimated for individual jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(overhead, be applied to jobs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for individual jobs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(overhead, be applied to jobs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cost, be estimated for jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cost, be estimated for individual jobs)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(overhead, be applied to jobs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(overhead, be applied to jobs)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cost, be estimated for jobs)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(overhead, be applied to jobs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(overhead, be applied to jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overhead, be applied to jobs)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(overhead, be applied to jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(overhead, be applied to jobs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(overhead, be applied to jobs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(overhead, be applied to jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overhead, be applied to jobs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(overhead, be applied to jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(overhead, be applied to jobs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cost, be estimated for jobs)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(overhead, be applied to jobs)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cost, be estimated for individual jobs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(overhead, be applied to jobs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cost, be estimated for jobs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(overhead, be applied to jobs)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cost, be estimated for individual jobs)