cost: be higher compared to china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be higher compared to china 1.00
rise in china 0.86
is higher 0.82
be higher in india 0.78
be higher than usa 0.77
be higher in europe 0.76
be much higher than sales tax 0.76
be higher in cases 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(burden, be higher in cases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cost, be higher compared to china)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(burden, be higher in cases)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(burden, be higher in cases)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(tuition, is higher)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(burden, be higher in cases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(cost, be higher compared to china)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(tuition, is higher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(tuition, is higher)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(cost, be higher compared to china)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cost, be higher than usa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(cost, rise in china)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cost, rise in china)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(cost, rise in china)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cost, rise in china)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(cost, be higher than usa)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cost, be higher in europe)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher in india)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher in europe)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cost, be higher than usa)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cost, be higher in india)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cost, be higher in europe)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cost, be higher in india)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(cost, be higher in europe)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(cost, be higher in india)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher than usa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher compared to china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cost, be higher compared to china)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(burden, be higher in cases)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tuition, is higher)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cost, be higher compared to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(burden, be higher in cases)