cost: be higher in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be higher in india 1.00
be high in india 0.95
be higher than usa 0.89
be higher in europe 0.88
be calculated in india 0.87
be high in america 0.83
be high in canada 0.83
is high in america 0.83
rise in canada 0.83
be high in australia 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(tuition, rise in canada)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(tuition, be high in canada)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in canada)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in india)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in india)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be calculated in india)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(tuition, rise in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(tuition, rise in canada)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tuition, be high in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(tuition, be high in america)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(tuition, be high in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tuition, be high in canada)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(cost, be higher in india)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cost, be higher than usa)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(cost, be higher than usa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cost, be higher than usa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(cost, be higher in europe)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cost, be higher in europe)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cost, be higher in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tuition, rise in canada)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in india)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in india)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tuition, be high in america)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tuition, be high in canada)
...