cost: have important profit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have important profit 1.00
have profit 0.98
include profit 0.88
have revenue 0.80
affect revenue 0.79
is income 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(fee, is income)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(fee, is income)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(fee, is income)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(cost, have important profit)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cost, include profit)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(cost, include profit)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cost, include profit)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cost, have revenue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cost, have revenue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(cost, have revenue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(cost, include profit)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cost, affect revenue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cost, affect revenue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cost, affect revenue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cost, affect revenue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cost, have revenue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cost, have important profit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cost, have important profit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cost, have important profit)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(fee, is income)