cost: have revenue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have revenue 1.00
affect revenue 0.96
maximize revenue 0.86
have important profit 0.80
have profit 0.80
be much higher than sales tax 0.80
is income 0.77
affect profitability 0.76
be much higher than investment tax 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cost, have revenue)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cost, have revenue)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cost, have revenue)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(fee, is income)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cost, have revenue)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cost, have revenue)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(fee, is income)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(fee, is income)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cost, have revenue)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cost, have revenue)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(cost, have revenue)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cost, have revenue)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cost, affect revenue)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cost, have revenue)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cost, maximize revenue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cost, have revenue)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cost, have important profit)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cost, have revenue)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cost, affect profitability)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(cost, have revenue)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cost, affect revenue)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(cost, have revenue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cost, have revenue)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cost, have revenue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cost, have revenue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cost, have revenue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cost, have revenue)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(fee, is income)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cost, have revenue)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cost, have revenue)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)