cost: maximize revenue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
maximize revenue 1.00
affect revenue 0.86
have revenue 0.86
affect profitability 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(cost, maximize revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cost, maximize revenue)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(cost, maximize revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cost, have revenue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(cost, maximize revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cost, have revenue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(cost, maximize revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cost, affect revenue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(cost, maximize revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cost, affect revenue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cost, maximize revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(cost, have revenue)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cost, maximize revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cost, affect revenue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cost, maximize revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cost, affect profitability)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cost, maximize revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cost, have revenue)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cost, maximize revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cost, affect revenue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(cost, maximize revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(cost, affect profitability)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(cost, maximize revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cost, affect profitability)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cost, maximize revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(cost, affect profitability)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cost, maximize revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cost, maximize revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cost, maximize revenue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(cost, maximize revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cost, maximize revenue)