cost: affect profitability

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect profitability 1.00
affect growth 0.81
affect revenue 0.80
maximize revenue 0.78
affect growth of plants 0.78
affect plant growth 0.77
have revenue 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(variable, affect plant growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cost, affect profitability)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(variable, affect plant growth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(variable, affect plant growth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(variable, affect plant growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(cost, affect profitability)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(cost, affect profitability)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cost, have revenue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cost, have revenue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cost, affect revenue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cost, maximize revenue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(cost, maximize revenue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cost, maximize revenue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cost, affect growth of plants)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cost, affect revenue)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cost, maximize revenue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(cost, have revenue)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cost, affect revenue)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cost, affect revenue)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cost, have revenue)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(cost, affect growth of plants)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cost, affect growth of plants)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cost, affect growth of plants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cost, affect profitability)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cost, affect profitability)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(variable, affect plant growth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(cost, affect profitability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(variable, affect plant growth)