cost: affect revenue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect revenue 1.00
have revenue 0.96
maximize revenue 0.86
affect growth 0.81
affect profitability 0.80
be much higher than sales tax 0.79
have important profit 0.79
affect expenses 0.78
have profit 0.77
is income 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cost, affect revenue)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cost, affect revenue)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(income tax, affect expenses)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cost, affect revenue)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(fee, is income)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cost, affect revenue)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cost, affect revenue)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(income tax, affect expenses)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(income tax, affect expenses)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cost, affect revenue)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(fee, is income)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(fee, is income)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cost, affect revenue)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cost, affect revenue)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(cost, affect revenue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cost, have revenue)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cost, affect revenue)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cost, have revenue)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(cost, affect revenue)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cost, have revenue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(cost, affect revenue)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(cost, have revenue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(cost, affect revenue)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cost, maximize revenue)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(cost, affect revenue)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cost, affect revenue)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cost, affect revenue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cost, affect revenue)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cost, affect revenue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cost, affect revenue)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(fee, is income)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cost, affect revenue)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(income tax, affect expenses)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cost, affect revenue)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)