country music: is great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents song
Weight: 0.73
, classical music
Weight: 0.73
, pop music
Weight: 0.70
, thing
Weight: 0.64
, musician
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hank williams
Weight: 0.60
, love song
Weight: 0.38
, rap music
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great 1.00
has quality good 0.81
is terrible 0.79
is best 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(classical music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, is great)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, is great)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(classical music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, is great)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(classical music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, is great)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pop music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, is great)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pop music, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, is great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(classical music, is great)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pop music, is terrible)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pop music, is best)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(classical music, is best)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is terrible)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(classical music, is great)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(classical music, is best)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(love song, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(classical music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(country music, is great)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(country music, is great)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(classical music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(country music, is great)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(classical music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(country music, is great)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pop music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(country music, is great)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pop music, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(country music, is great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(love song, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(love song, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rap music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rap music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rap music, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(country music, is great)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(country music, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(country music, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(country music, is terrible)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(country music, is terrible)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(country music, is best)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, is best)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(country music, is terrible)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(country music, is best)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(country music, is terrible)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(country music, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pop music, is terrible)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(classical music, is great)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pop music, is best)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(classical music, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(love song, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rap music, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(classical music, is great)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pop music, is terrible)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pop music, is best)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(classical music, is best)