pop music: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents music
Weight: 0.71
, rock music
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.62
, media
Weight: 0.61
Siblings classical music
Weight: 0.74
, country music
Weight: 0.70
, rap music
Weight: 0.59
, rock n roll
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality shit 0.79
is bad now 0.78
is bad right now 0.76
is best 0.76
be bad today 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rock music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(media, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rock music, is best)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(rock music, be bad today)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(music, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(music, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(media, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(rock music, be bad today)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rock music, is best)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(rock music, be bad today)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(media, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rock music, is best)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(country music, is bad now)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(rap music, be bad today)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rock n roll, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(classical music, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(country music, is best)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rock music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(media, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rock music, is best)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(rock music, be bad today)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rap music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(country music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(rock n roll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rock n roll, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(country music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(country music, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(country music, is bad now)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(rap music, be bad today)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(rap music, be bad today)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(country music, is best)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(country music, is best)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rap music, is best)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rap music, is best)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(classical music, is best)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(classical music, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(pop music, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(pop music, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(pop music, has quality shit)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(pop music, is bad now)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality shit)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pop music, is bad now)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pop music, is bad now)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality shit)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(pop music, is bad right now)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(pop music, is bad right now)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(pop music, is bad right now)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is bad now)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is bad right now)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(pop music, be bad today)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(pop music, be bad today)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(pop music, is best)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(pop music, be bad today)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be bad today)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pop music, is best)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pop music, is best)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality shit)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(rock music, be bad today)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(media, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(country music, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(country music, is bad now)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(rap music, be bad today)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(country music, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock n roll, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, is best)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rap music, is best)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(classical music, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(media, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(rock music, be bad today)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, is best)