pop music: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents music
Weight: 0.71
, rock music
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.62
, media
Weight: 0.61
Siblings classical music
Weight: 0.74
, country music
Weight: 0.70
, rap music
Weight: 0.59
, rock n roll
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is bad now 0.84
be bad today 0.82
is bad right now 0.80
is nowadays bad 0.80
is bad nowadays 0.80
has quality shit 0.79
is terrible thoughty2 0.77
is terrible 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rock music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(media, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(rock music, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(rock music, be bad today)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(music, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(media, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(media, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(rock music, be bad today)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rock n roll, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(country music, is bad now)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(rap music, be bad today)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(country music, is terrible)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rock music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(media, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(rock music, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(country music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rap music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(classical music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(country music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(rock n roll, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rock n roll, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(country music, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(country music, is bad now)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(rap music, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(rap music, be bad today)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(country music, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(country music, is terrible)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(pop music, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(pop music, be bad today)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(pop music, be bad today)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pop music, is bad now)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be bad today)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(pop music, is bad now)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is bad now)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(pop music, is bad right now)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(pop music, is bad right now)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is bad right now)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(pop music, be bad today)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pop music, is bad nowadays)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pop music, is bad now)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(pop music, is bad right now)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is bad nowadays)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(pop music, is bad nowadays)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(pop music, is terrible thoughty2)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is terrible thoughty2)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is nowadays bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(pop music, is terrible thoughty2)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(pop music, is nowadays bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(pop music, is bad nowadays)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(pop music, is nowadays bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(pop music, is nowadays bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pop music, is terrible thoughty2)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is terrible)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality shit)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality shit)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality shit)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(pop music, has quality shit)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pop music, is terrible)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(pop music, is terrible)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pop music, is terrible)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(pop music, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(media, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(rock music, be bad today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(country music, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(country music, is bad now)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(country music, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock n roll, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(rap music, be bad today)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(country music, is terrible)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(media, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(rock music, be bad today)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)