rock music: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents music
Weight: 0.71
, style
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, musician
Weight: 0.60
Siblings classical music
Weight: 0.71
, pop music
Weight: 0.67
, prog
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is best 0.76
be bad today 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(style, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(style, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(style, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(music, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(style, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(music, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(style, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(style, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be bad today)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(classical music, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(style, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(style, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(classical music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(pop music, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(pop music, be bad today)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pop music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pop music, is best)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(classical music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(classical music, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rock music, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(rock music, has quality bad)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rock music, is best)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(rock music, be bad today)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, is best)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(rock music, be bad today)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(rock music, be bad today)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rock music, is best)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(rock music, be bad today)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rock music, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(style, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(style, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(pop music, be bad today)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pop music, is best)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(classical music, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(style, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(style, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)