rock music: is best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents music
Weight: 0.71
, style
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, musician
Weight: 0.60
Siblings classical music
Weight: 0.71
, pop music
Weight: 0.67
, prog
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best 1.00
has quality good 0.76
is best genre 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, is best)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(style, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, is best)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(style, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(style, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(classical music, is best)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rock music, is best)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(style, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rock music, is best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pop music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pop music, is best)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(classical music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(classical music, is best)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(classical music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rock music, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rock music, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(rock music, is best genre)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, is best genre)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rock music, is best genre)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rock music, is best genre)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rock music, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(style, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pop music, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(classical music, is best)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(style, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rock music, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)