music: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rock music
Weight: 0.69
, entertainment
Weight: 0.64
, pop
Weight: 0.64
, opera
Weight: 0.62
Siblings chamber music
Weight: 0.79
, classical music
Weight: 0.72
, pop music
Weight: 0.71
, jazz
Weight: 0.66
, loud music
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
have good 0.88
be good on dxm 0.84
is good high 0.83
get good 0.82
is great 0.81
be good for health 0.80
feel good 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(opera, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pop, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rock music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(entertainment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(entertainment, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pop, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(opera, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pop, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(opera, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(entertainment, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(classical music, be good on dxm)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(loud music, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(classical music, is great)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(jazz, is great)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(loud music, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(music, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(opera, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(music, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pop, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(music, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(entertainment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(music, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rock music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(music, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(jazz, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(classical music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(classical music, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(loud music, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(loud music, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(classical music, be good on dxm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(classical music, be good on dxm)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(jazz, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(jazz, is great)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(classical music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(classical music, is great)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(loud music, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(loud music, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(music, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(music, has quality bad)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(music, has quality bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(music, is great)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(music, is great)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(music, is great)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(music, is great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(entertainment, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pop, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(opera, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(classical music, be good on dxm)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(loud music, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jazz, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(loud music, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(jazz, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality better)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(jazz, is great)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(classical music, is great)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(entertainment, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pop, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(opera, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality bad)