jazz: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents music
Weight: 0.66
, song
Weight: 0.64
, topic
Weight: 0.59
, format
Weight: 0.58
Siblings classical music
Weight: 0.38
, jazz music
Weight: 0.38
, pop music
Weight: 0.37
, rock music
Weight: 0.37
, country music
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is great 0.81
is bad now 0.78
be considered quality music 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(jazz, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(jazz, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(jazz, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(music, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(music, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(music, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(music, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is bad now)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(country music, is bad now)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(classical music, is great)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(jazz, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(jazz, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(jazz, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(classical music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(jazz music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(jazz music, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(country music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(jazz music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(jazz music, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(country music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rock music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(pop music, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pop music, is bad now)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(country music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(country music, is great)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(classical music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(classical music, is great)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(jazz music, is great)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(country music, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(country music, is bad now)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(jazz, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(jazz, has quality bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jazz, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(jazz, is great)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(jazz, be considered quality music)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(jazz, is great)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(jazz, is great)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(jazz, is great)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(jazz, be considered quality music)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(jazz, be considered quality music)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(jazz, be considered quality music)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(jazz, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(music, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pop music, is bad now)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(jazz music, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(country music, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(country music, is bad now)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(jazz music, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(country music, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(classical music, is great)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, is great)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(jazz music, is great)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(music, is great)