jazz music: is great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, music
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.57
, musician
Weight: 0.51
, field
Weight: 0.50
Siblings classical music
Weight: 0.38
, jazz
Weight: 0.38
, chamber music
Weight: 0.37
, pop music
Weight: 0.37
, rock music
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great 1.00
has quality good 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(jazz music, is great)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(jazz music, is great)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(field, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(jazz music, is great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(music, is great)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(field, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(music, is great)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(field, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(classical music, is great)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(jazz, is great)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(jazz music, is great)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(jazz music, is great)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(field, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(jazz music, is great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(jazz, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(jazz, is great)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(classical music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(classical music, is great)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(jazz, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(jazz, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(classical music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(jazz music, is great)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(jazz music, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(jazz music, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(jazz music, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(jazz music, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(music, is great)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(field, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(jazz, is great)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(classical music, is great)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(jazz, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(music, is great)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(field, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(jazz music, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)