court: apply concepts to cases involving

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tennis court
Weight: 0.75
, tribunal
Weight: 0.69
, school
Weight: 0.64
, court case
Weight: 0.63
Siblings county court
Weight: 0.83
, supreme court
Weight: 0.73
, basketball court
Weight: 0.64
, grand jury
Weight: 0.62
, justice
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
apply concepts to cases involving 1.00
apply concepts to cases 0.96
be involved in cases 0.86
be involved in cases concerning 0.86
use past cases 0.84
rule in cases 0.82
hear cases 0.80
get case 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, hear cases)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(supreme court, hear cases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(supreme court, hear cases)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(court, apply concepts to cases involving)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(court, be involved in cases concerning)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(court, be involved in cases)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(court, use past cases)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(court, hear cases)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(court, hear cases)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(court, be involved in cases)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(court, be involved in cases)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(court, use past cases)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(court, hear cases)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(court, be involved in cases concerning)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(court, be involved in cases)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(court, hear cases)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(court, use past cases)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(court, use past cases)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(court, be involved in cases concerning)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(court, be involved in cases concerning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(court, apply concepts to cases involving)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(court, apply concepts to cases involving)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(court, apply concepts to cases involving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(supreme court, hear cases)