crap: be illegal in minnesota

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, word
Weight: 0.60
, game
Weight: 0.57
, favorite
Weight: 0.55
Siblings flip flop
Weight: 0.65
, ss
Weight: 0.52
, shit
Weight: 0.37
, hey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in minnesota 1.00
be illegal in oklahoma 0.90
be illegal in florida 0.89
be illegal in arizona 0.87
be illegal in california 0.86
is illegal 0.80
be illegal in indian casinos 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in minnesota)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in florida)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in florida)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in arizona)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in california)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in arizona)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in california)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(crap, be illegal in florida)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(crap, be illegal in arizona)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(crap, be illegal in california)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crap, is illegal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(crap, is illegal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(crap, is illegal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in indian casinos)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in indian casinos)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(crap, be illegal in indian casinos)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in florida)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in california)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in arizona)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in indian casinos)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(crap, is illegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in minnesota)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in minnesota)