crap: be illegal in indian casinos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, word
Weight: 0.60
, game
Weight: 0.57
, favorite
Weight: 0.55
Siblings flip flop
Weight: 0.65
, ss
Weight: 0.52
, shit
Weight: 0.37
, hey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in indian casinos 1.00
be illegal in casinos 0.94
be illegal in oklahoma 0.80
be illegal in florida 0.77
be illegal in arizona 0.77
be illegal in minnesota 0.76
is illegal 0.76
be illegal in california 0.75
be called craps 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in indian casinos)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in casinos)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in casinos)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(crap, be illegal in casinos)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in florida)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in florida)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in arizona)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in arizona)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crap, is illegal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(crap, is illegal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in california)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(crap, be called craps)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in california)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(crap, be called craps)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(crap, be illegal in florida)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(crap, be illegal in arizona)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(crap, is illegal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(crap, be illegal in california)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(crap, be called craps)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in casinos)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in arizona)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in florida)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in california)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(crap, be called craps)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(crap, is illegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in indian casinos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(crap, be illegal in indian casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in indian casinos)