crap: be illegal in oklahoma

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, word
Weight: 0.60
, game
Weight: 0.57
, favorite
Weight: 0.55
Siblings flip flop
Weight: 0.65
, ss
Weight: 0.52
, shit
Weight: 0.37
, hey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in oklahoma 1.00
be illegal in minnesota 0.90
be illegal in arizona 0.88
be illegal in florida 0.87
be illegal in california 0.87
is illegal 0.80
be illegal in indian casinos 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in arizona)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in arizona)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in florida)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in california)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in florida)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in california)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(crap, be illegal in arizona)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(crap, be illegal in florida)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(crap, be illegal in california)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crap, is illegal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(crap, is illegal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in indian casinos)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(crap, be illegal in indian casinos)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(crap, is illegal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(crap, be illegal in indian casinos)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in minnesota)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in arizona)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in california)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in florida)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in indian casinos)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(crap, is illegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(crap, be illegal in oklahoma)