crime: relate to law

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conspiracy
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.60
, attack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arson
Weight: 0.70
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, cruelty
Weight: 0.68
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.68
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
relate to law 1.00
be against law 0.83
be dealt by law 0.81
have statute 0.79
relate to democracy 0.78
have statute of limitations 0.76
relate to race 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tragedy, relate to democracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(crime, relate to law)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tragedy, relate to democracy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tragedy, relate to democracy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be against law)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be against law)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be dealt by law)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tragedy, relate to democracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(crime, relate to law)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be dealt by law)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be against law)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(drunk driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, be against law)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(crime, relate to law)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(crime, have statute of limitations)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(crime, have statute of limitations)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(crime, have statute of limitations)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(crime, have statute of limitations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(crime, relate to law)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(crime, relate to law)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(tragedy, relate to democracy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be against law)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be dealt by law)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be against law)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(tragedy, relate to democracy)