sexual harassment: be dealt by law

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual assault
Weight: 0.77
, complaint
Weight: 0.70
, crime
Weight: 0.69
, behavior
Weight: 0.69
Siblings flirting
Weight: 0.54
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.39
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.38
, rape
Weight: 0.37
, bullying
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dealt by law 1.00
was dealt with with maryland 0.82
be against law 0.81
relate to law 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(crime, was dealt with with maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be dealt by law)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be dealt by law)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(crime, relate to law)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(crime, was dealt with with maryland)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(crime, was dealt with with maryland)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(crime, relate to law)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(crime, was dealt with with maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be dealt by law)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be dealt by law)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be dealt by law)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be against law)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be against law)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be against law)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be against law)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be dealt by law)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be dealt by law)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(crime, relate to law)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(crime, was dealt with with maryland)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(crime, relate to law)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(crime, was dealt with with maryland)