crime: was dealt with with maryland

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conspiracy
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.60
, attack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arson
Weight: 0.70
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, cruelty
Weight: 0.68
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.68
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
was dealt with with maryland 1.00
be dealt by law 0.82
be is addressed in florida 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(crime, was dealt with with maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(crime, was dealt with with maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be dealt by law)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(crime, was dealt with with maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be dealt by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be dealt by law)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(crime, was dealt with with maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(crime, was dealt with with maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(crime, was dealt with with maryland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(crime, was dealt with with maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(crime, was dealt with with maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(crime, was dealt with with maryland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(crime, was dealt with with maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(crime, was dealt with with maryland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(crime, was dealt with with maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be dealt by law)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(crime, was dealt with with maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)