drunk driving: be is addressed in florida

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents car accident
Weight: 0.69
, behavior
Weight: 0.68
, accident
Weight: 0.68
, crime
Weight: 0.68
, felony
Weight: 0.66
Siblings driving
Weight: 0.37
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.35
, crash
Weight: 0.35
, plane crash
Weight: 0.35
, sexual assault
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be is addressed in florida 1.00
be high in florida 0.86
be is addressed 0.83
was dealt with with maryland 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(crime, was dealt with with maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(crime, was dealt with with maryland)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(crime, was dealt with with maryland)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(driving, be is addressed in florida)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(driving, be is addressed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(crime, was dealt with with maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(driving, be is addressed in florida)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(driving, be is addressed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be is addressed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, be is addressed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(drunk driving, be is addressed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(crime, was dealt with with maryland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(driving, be is addressed in florida)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(driving, be is addressed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(crime, was dealt with with maryland)