driving: be is addressed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.60
, duty
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, accident
Weight: 0.53
Siblings drunk driving
Weight: 0.37
, car accident
Weight: 0.34
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.33
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.33
, crash
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be is addressed 1.00
be is addressed in florida 0.83
be resolved 0.79
be how resolved 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(issue, be how resolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(driving, be is addressed)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(issue, be resolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(driving, be is addressed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(issue, be resolved)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(issue, be how resolved)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(issue, be resolved)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(issue, be how resolved)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(issue, be resolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(driving, be is addressed)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(issue, be how resolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(driving, be is addressed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, be is addressed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(driving, be is addressed)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(driving, be is addressed in florida)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(driving, be is addressed in florida)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(driving, be is addressed in florida)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(driving, be is addressed in florida)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(driving, be is addressed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(driving, be is addressed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(issue, be resolved)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(issue, be how resolved)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be is addressed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(issue, be resolved)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(driving, be is addressed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(issue, be how resolved)