criminal: were treated in middle ages

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.64
, individual
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, other people
Weight: 0.54
Siblings child molester
Weight: 0.68
, drug addict
Weight: 0.67
, hacker
Weight: 0.63
, terrorist
Weight: 0.62
, drug dealer
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated in middle ages 1.00
were punished in middle ages 0.91
was treated in 1800 0.81
were handled among different social classes 0.77
were treated during holocaust 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(criminal, were treated in middle ages)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(criminal, were punished in middle ages)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(criminal, were handled among different social classes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(criminal, were punished in middle ages)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(criminal, were handled among different social classes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(criminal, were handled among different social classes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(criminal, was treated in 1800)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(criminal, were punished in middle ages)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(criminal, were handled among different social classes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(criminal, was treated in 1800)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(criminal, was treated in 1800)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(criminal, were treated during holocaust)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(criminal, were punished in middle ages)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(criminal, was treated in 1800)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(criminal, were treated during holocaust)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(criminal, were treated during holocaust)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(criminal, were treated during holocaust)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(criminal, were treated in middle ages)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(criminal, were treated in middle ages)