cruelty: has constitution makeup

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, kindness
Weight: 0.57
, sin
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
Siblings starvation
Weight: 0.62
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.36
, torture
Weight: 0.34
, arson
Weight: 0.34
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has constitution makeup 1.00
is makeup important 0.85
is makeup better 0.84
is free makeup 0.83
is free makeup important 0.82
is free makeup better 0.81
be violation of us constitution 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(torture, be violation of us constitution)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(torture, be violation of us constitution)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(torture, be violation of us constitution)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(cruelty, has constitution makeup)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is free makeup better)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(cruelty, is free makeup better)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is free makeup)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is free makeup important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(cruelty, is free makeup important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(cruelty, is makeup better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cruelty, is free makeup)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is makeup better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is free makeup better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(cruelty, is makeup better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(cruelty, is free makeup better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(cruelty, is makeup important)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is makeup better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is free makeup important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is free makeup)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cruelty, is free makeup important)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cruelty, is free makeup)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is makeup important)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cruelty, is makeup important)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is makeup important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has constitution makeup)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cruelty, has constitution makeup)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(torture, be violation of us constitution)