cruelty: is makeup important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, kindness
Weight: 0.57
, sin
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
Siblings starvation
Weight: 0.62
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.36
, torture
Weight: 0.34
, arson
Weight: 0.34
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is makeup important 1.00
is makeup better 0.96
is free makeup important 0.95
is free makeup 0.93
is free makeup better 0.91
has constitution makeup 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cruelty, is makeup important)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is free makeup important)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is makeup better)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(cruelty, is free makeup important)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is free makeup)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(cruelty, is makeup better)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is free makeup better)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(cruelty, is free makeup better)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cruelty, is free makeup)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is makeup better)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is free makeup better)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is free makeup important)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is free makeup)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(cruelty, is makeup better)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(cruelty, is free makeup better)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cruelty, is free makeup important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cruelty, is free makeup)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is makeup important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cruelty, is makeup important)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(cruelty, is makeup important)