cup: has physical part holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents container
Weight: 0.69
, item
Weight: 0.61
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.60
, bowl
Weight: 0.59
Siblings coffee cup
Weight: 0.73
, ramekin
Weight: 0.37
, jug
Weight: 0.35
, coffee mug
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part holes 1.00
have holes in them 0.89
have hole in middle 0.83
be left in hole 0.81
has physical part ridges 0.77
be left in hole in tree 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(container, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cup, has physical part holes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(item, be left in hole in tree)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cup, has physical part holes)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cup, has physical part holes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(container, has physical part holes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(container, has physical part ridges)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(item, be left in hole in tree)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(container, has physical part holes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(container, has physical part ridges)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(item, be left in hole in tree)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coffee cup, has physical part holes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, have hole in middle)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, have holes in them)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(container, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cup, has physical part holes)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(item, be left in hole in tree)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cup, has physical part holes)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cup, has physical part holes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(coffee cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(coffee cup, has physical part holes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(wooden spoon, have hole in middle)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, have hole in middle)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wooden spoon, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, have holes in them)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(cup, has physical part holes)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cup, has physical part ridges)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(cup, has physical part ridges)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(cup, has physical part ridges)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part ridges)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cup, has physical part holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(container, has physical part holes)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(container, has physical part ridges)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(item, be left in hole in tree)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(coffee cup, has physical part holes)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, have hole in middle)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, have holes in them)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(container, has physical part holes)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(container, has physical part ridges)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(item, be left in hole in tree)