cup: has physical part ridges

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents container
Weight: 0.69
, item
Weight: 0.61
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.60
, bowl
Weight: 0.59
Siblings coffee cup
Weight: 0.73
, ramekin
Weight: 0.37
, jug
Weight: 0.35
, coffee mug
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part ridges 1.00
have ridges in neck 0.89
has physical part bottoms 0.78
has physical part holes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cup, has physical part ridges)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(container, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cup, has physical part ridges)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(container, has physical part ridges)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(container, has physical part holes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(container, has physical part ridges)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(container, has physical part holes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coffee cup, has physical part holes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(cup, has physical part ridges)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(container, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(cup, has physical part ridges)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(coffee cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(coffee cup, has physical part holes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(cup, has physical part ridges)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cup, have ridges in neck)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cup, have ridges in neck)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(cup, have ridges in neck)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cup, have ridges in neck)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cup, has physical part holes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(cup, has physical part holes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cup, has physical part holes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part ridges)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cup, has physical part ridges)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(container, has physical part ridges)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(container, has physical part holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(coffee cup, has physical part holes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(container, has physical part ridges)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(container, has physical part holes)