custard: is potentially hazardous foods

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.76
, dish
Weight: 0.71
, flavor
Weight: 0.64
, sweet
Weight: 0.60
, ice cream
Weight: 0.55
Siblings flan
Weight: 0.63
, lemon curd
Weight: 0.61
, tiramisu
Weight: 0.40
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.40
, frozen custard
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
is potentially hazardous foods 1.00
is hazardous foods 0.95
is foods 0.82
is dangerous 0.80
be unhealthy 0.78
is unhealthy 0.78
taste foods 0.77
taste healthier foods 0.77
taste then healthier foods 0.77
taste better healthier foods 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(dessert, taste better healthier foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(custard, is potentially hazardous foods)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(custard, is potentially hazardous foods)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(dessert, taste then healthier foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(custard, is potentially hazardous foods)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, taste foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(custard, is potentially hazardous foods)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(dessert, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(custard, is potentially hazardous foods)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(dessert, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(custard, is potentially hazardous foods)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(sweet, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(custard, is potentially hazardous foods)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(dessert, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(sweet, is unhealthy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(dessert, is unhealthy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste better healthier foods)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is dangerous)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(sweet, is unhealthy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is unhealthy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste better healthier foods)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(flan, is unhealthy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, is unhealthy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(dessert, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(dessert, taste better healthier foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(dessert, taste then healthier foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, taste foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(dessert, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(sweet, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(flan, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(flan, is unhealthy)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tiramisu, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, is unhealthy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(custard, is potentially hazardous foods)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(custard, is foods)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(custard, is hazardous foods)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(custard, is hazardous foods)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(custard, is foods)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(custard, is hazardous foods)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(custard, is hazardous foods)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(custard, is foods)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(custard, is foods)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(custard, is potentially hazardous foods)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(dessert, taste foods)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(sweet, is unhealthy)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(dessert, is dangerous)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dessert, taste healthier foods)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(dessert, is unhealthy)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dessert, taste better healthier foods)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(flan, is unhealthy)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tiramisu, is unhealthy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(dessert, taste foods)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(sweet, is unhealthy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(dessert, is dangerous)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dessert, taste healthier foods)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(dessert, is unhealthy)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(custard, is potentially hazardous foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dessert, taste better healthier foods)