customer: return to restaurants

Property	Similarity
return to restaurants	1.00
sit in restaurants	0.87
return	0.81
return good to company	0.78
return products	0.77

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(customer, return to restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(customer, sit in restaurants)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(customer, return to restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(customer, sit in restaurants)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(customer, return to restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(customer, sit in restaurants)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(customer, return to restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(customer, return)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(customer, return to restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(customer, sit in restaurants)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(customer, return to restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(customer, return)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(customer, return to restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(customer, return)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(customer, return to restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(customer, return good to company)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(customer, return to restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(customer, return products)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(customer, return to restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(customer, return)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(customer, return to restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(customer, return good to company)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(customer, return to restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(customer, return good to company)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(customer, return to restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(customer, return products)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(customer, return to restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(customer, return good to company)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(customer, return to restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(customer, return products)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(customer, return to restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(customer, return products)

Parents	computer user Weight: 0.65 , fan Weight: 0.64 , constituent Weight: 0.63 , business people Weight: 0.62
Siblings	employer Weight: 0.63 , staff Weight: 0.62 , intel Weight: 0.60 , asset Weight: 0.59 , john deere Weight: 0.58

customer: return to restaurants

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible