customer: return good to company

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer user
Weight: 0.65
, fan
Weight: 0.64
, constituent
Weight: 0.63
, business people
Weight: 0.62
Siblings employer
Weight: 0.63
, staff
Weight: 0.62
, intel
Weight: 0.60
, asset
Weight: 0.59
, john deere
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
return good to company 1.00
return 0.87
leave company 0.85
return products 0.84
think as company 0.79
return to restaurants 0.78
doing business with company 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(customer, return good to company)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(customer, leave company)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(customer, leave company)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(customer, leave company)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(customer, leave company)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(customer, return)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(customer, return)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(customer, return)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(customer, return to restaurants)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(customer, return)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(customer, return to restaurants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(customer, return products)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(customer, think as company)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(customer, return to restaurants)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(customer, return products)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(customer, return products)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(customer, return products)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(customer, think as company)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(customer, doing business with company)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(customer, doing business with company)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(customer, return to restaurants)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(customer, doing business with company)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(customer, think as company)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(customer, doing business with company)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(customer, think as company)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(customer, return good to company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(customer, return good to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(customer, return good to company)