customer: doing business with company

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer user
Weight: 0.65
, fan
Weight: 0.64
, constituent
Weight: 0.63
, business people
Weight: 0.62
Siblings employer
Weight: 0.63
, staff
Weight: 0.62
, intel
Weight: 0.60
, asset
Weight: 0.59
, john deere
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
doing business with company 1.00
think as company 0.87
be important to business 0.85
be interested in business 0.80
leave company 0.80
be interested in success of business 0.78
return good to company 0.78
be at heart of zappos business strategy 0.77
influence business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(employer, be important to business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(employer, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(employer, be important to business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(customer, doing business with company)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(customer, think as company)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(customer, leave company)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(customer, leave company)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(customer, leave company)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(customer, leave company)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(customer, think as company)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(customer, be important to business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(customer, be at heart of zappos business strategy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(customer, be at heart of zappos business strategy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(customer, be at heart of zappos business strategy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(customer, return good to company)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(customer, be at heart of zappos business strategy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(customer, return good to company)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(customer, influence business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(customer, be interested in business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(customer, influence business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(customer, think as company)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(customer, influence business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(customer, return good to company)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(customer, return good to company)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(customer, be interested in success of business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(customer, be important to business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(customer, be interested in business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(customer, influence business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(customer, be interested in success of business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(customer, be interested in business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(customer, be important to business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(customer, be interested in success of business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(customer, be interested in business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(customer, be interested in success of business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(customer, be important to business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(customer, think as company)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(customer, doing business with company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(customer, doing business with company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(customer, doing business with company)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(employer, be important to business)