customer: influence business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer user
Weight: 0.65
, fan
Weight: 0.64
, constituent
Weight: 0.63
, business people
Weight: 0.62
Siblings employer
Weight: 0.63
, staff
Weight: 0.62
, intel
Weight: 0.60
, asset
Weight: 0.59
, john deere
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
influence business 1.00
be important to business 0.80
be interested in success of business 0.77
doing business with company 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(employer, be important to business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(employer, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(employer, be important to business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(customer, influence business)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(customer, doing business with company)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(customer, be interested in success of business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(customer, be important to business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(customer, doing business with company)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(customer, doing business with company)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(customer, doing business with company)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(customer, be important to business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(customer, be important to business)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(customer, be interested in success of business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(customer, be interested in success of business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(customer, be important to business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(customer, be interested in success of business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(customer, influence business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(customer, influence business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(customer, influence business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(employer, be important to business)