customer: be important to business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer user
Weight: 0.65
, fan
Weight: 0.64
, constituent
Weight: 0.63
, business people
Weight: 0.62
Siblings employer
Weight: 0.63
, staff
Weight: 0.62
, intel
Weight: 0.60
, asset
Weight: 0.59
, john deere
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to business 1.00
doing business with company 0.85
be interested in business 0.85
be interested in success of business 0.83
be at heart of zappos business strategy 0.81
influence business 0.80
think as company 0.78
be important in retailing 0.77
be important to us 0.77
be important in hospitality industry 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(customer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(employer, be important to business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(customer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(employer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(employer, be important to business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(customer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(customer, be important to business)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(customer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(customer, be at heart of zappos business strategy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(customer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(customer, be at heart of zappos business strategy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(customer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(customer, doing business with company)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(customer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(customer, influence business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(customer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(customer, doing business with company)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(customer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(customer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(customer, be important to business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(customer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(customer, be important to business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(customer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(employer, be important to business)