daffodils: has quality question

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bulb
Weight: 0.50
, flower
Weight: 0.49
, perennial
Weight: 0.45
, narcissus
Weight: 0.36
Siblings crocus
Weight: 0.34
, hydrangea
Weight: 0.34
, daffodil
Weight: 0.34
, tulip
Weight: 0.33
, aster
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality question 1.00
question 0.93
has quality questions 0.92
questions 0.83
has quality good 0.77
has quality bad 0.76
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(aster, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hydrangea, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(hydrangea, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(aster, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(aster, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(daffodils, has quality question)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(daffodils, question)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(daffodils, question)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(daffodils, has quality questions)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(daffodils, has quality questions)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(daffodils, question)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, question)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, has quality questions)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(daffodils, questions)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(daffodils, questions)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, questions)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(daffodils, questions)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(daffodils, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, has quality question)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(daffodils, has quality question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(aster, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(hydrangea, has quality good)