daffodils: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bulb
Weight: 0.50
, flower
Weight: 0.49
, perennial
Weight: 0.45
, narcissus
Weight: 0.36
Siblings crocus
Weight: 0.34
, hydrangea
Weight: 0.34
, daffodil
Weight: 0.34
, tulip
Weight: 0.33
, aster
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00
questions 0.92
has quality question 0.92
question 0.82
has quality good 0.76
has quality better 0.76
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(aster, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hydrangea, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(hydrangea, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(aster, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(aster, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(daffodils, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(daffodils, questions)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(daffodils, questions)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, questions)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(daffodils, questions)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(daffodils, question)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(daffodils, has quality question)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(daffodils, has quality question)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(daffodils, question)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, has quality question)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(daffodils, question)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, question)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(daffodils, has quality question)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(daffodils, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(aster, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(hydrangea, has quality good)